Free Admissibility & Citation Gap Briefing.Map your brand's footprint across the AI ecosystem and identify unverified Shadow Sources. Available for regulated enterprise evaluators.Secure Your Audit →

Before the gate runs

Legacy AI wrapper

Probabilistic "safety"
  • Post-generation filtering (too late)
  • Opaque "overall" scoring
  • Weak mapping to specific regulatory mandates
  • Easy to overstate compliance in prose

BiDigest control plane

Deterministic governance
  • Pre-execution commit boundary
  • Triple-lock authority (Legal / Risk / Eng)
  • Merkle-sealed IFQ receipts
  • Sub-50ms fail-closed path

Usage-based verify pricing — no surprise platform tax. Governance pricing →

The admissibility gate

Never let AI act
without authority.

The commit boundary enforces Legal, Risk, and Engineering sign-off before execution — on a fail-closed budget measured in milliseconds.

Legal
Risk
Eng
Fail-closed
Watch demoVault intake

The admissibility control plane

Stop governing the model.
Govern the consequence.

Post-generation alerts are probabilistic. BiDigest enforces a <50ms deterministic Commit Boundary. If an AI cannot mathematically prove its authority, it does not execute.

The fail-closed circuit breaker

When an unauthorized AI attempts a state-change (hallucinated advice, out-of-bounds API call), the Commit Boundary rejects the payload instantly.

  • Zero reliance on vendor LLM "safety" guardrails.
  • Prevents the Consequence Gap before it happens.
  • Protects enterprise liability deterministically.

Test your current AI stack against the Triple-Lock.

Status: Fail-closed

Simulate the Commit Boundary

Inject a synthetic payload against the gate. Diagnostic demo only—validates deterministic pattern matching, not your production Anchor Prose. You won't see a probabilistic "safety score"; you will see a hard execution verdict and the Triple-Lock telemetry.

Simulate Commit Boundary

Diagnostic demo v1.0

Inject synthetic payload

Agent requests a summary of the firm's approved Q3 data retention policy.

[READ] client_facing_chat

"Our Q3 data retention policy mandates a T+91 day purge for all non-essential PII."

L
Legal
R
Risk
E
Engineering
Awaiting payload injection…
Run a custom payload against your firm's Anchor Prose →

Stakeholder sign-off, encoded

Triple-lock flow aligns legal, risk, and engineering on the same ground truth—before traffic hits your models.

Trustee handbook →
  1. 1

    Legal

    Policy & regulatory fit

  2. 2

    Risk

    Control + evidence posture

  3. 3

    Engineering

    Enforcement in CI/CD

AI Visibility & Citation Share (The Growth Track)

Measure and optimize your entity's Citation Share across ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude. Map your AI Visibility Gap, identify unverified competitor citations, and replace probabilistic search results with deterministic brand authority. Dominate the AI retrieval ecosystem with mathematically verified ground truth.

Measure Citation Share

AI Governance & Admissibility (The Truth Track)

Shift from passive policy to Governance-as-Code. Establish a deterministic "Machine Handshake" by anchoring your Ground Truth to your regulatory identifiers. Eliminate Narrative Drift, block unauthorized execution, and generate Merkle-sealed "Evidence-while-running" for your internal controls.

Secure Admissibility Vault

Why BiDigest

For the CISO (Digital Trust)

Automated management controls align security, legal, and risk with one admissibility posture.

For the Architect

Fast execution boundaries that preserve stack performance while enforcing fail-closed behavior. Technical index →

For the Board

Field-level lineage plus T+91 purge minimizes liability while preserving verifiable forensic proof.

For the Auditor

Merkle-sealed receipts convert "I think" into "I can prove" across governed trajectories.

Sovereign KB · IFQ · per-LLM — ask here