BiDigest verifies whether an AI-triggered action is authorized before it reaches payments, claims, identity systems, or operational records.
Stop governing the model. Govern the consequence.
Real-time authorization and evidence at the moment an action would commit—not dashboards that only explain what already happened.
We stop unauthorized AI-triggered state changes before they become operational fact. Enforcement is deterministic and fail-closed on governed paths—independent of any model vendor’s chat “safety” score.
Example: if a bot tries to move money or change coverage outside policy, the disallowed call is blocked before it reaches your ledger or core systems.
Trust: Evidence first: use self-serve checks and scoped pilots so you see value before we ask you to pay for a subscription.
30-day satisfaction on your first paid subscription—email hi@bidigest.com within 30 days of first payment if we have not earned your trust (eligibility & exceptions in Terms).
Also: Explore the governance hubWhitepaperWatch demoVault intake
Jurisdictional readiness
Engineered for deployment models where decision metadata stays in your perimeter (VPC / region). Map supervisory obligations to primaries—UK, Singapore, EU—with counsel; we provide mechanical evidence, not a compliance label.
Why this matters now
The risk is no longer only unsafe text generation. AI systems are beginning to approve payments, modify coverage, trigger workflows, grant permissions, and write to systems of record—while most governance tooling still observes after execution.
Legacy posture: “Did the model generate unsafe text?”
BiDigest posture: “Is this action authorized to commit right now?”
BiDigest sits between agentic applications and the systems that must not change without current authority—inside your perimeter on governed paths (VPC / region-bound where instrumented).
AI agents & copilots
Proposals, tool calls, workflow triggers
BiDigest commit boundary
Policy validation · forensic receipts · fail-closed enforcement
Systems of record
Payments · claims · identity · ERP / core ops
CISO
Digital trust and automated controls
Architect
Fail-closed enforcement before bind
Board
Liability-minimizing forensic proof
Auditor
Replayable sealed forensic receipts
| Without BiDigest | With BiDigest |
|---|---|
| Post-execution monitoring | Pre-execution enforcement before state changes |
| Probabilistic model safety score | Deterministic authorization enforcement (fail-closed) |
| Vendor-controlled logic | Independent authority validation layer |
| Logs and dashboards | Replayable forensic evidence |
| Policy drift after the fact | Bind-time validation before operational fact |
See how BiDigest handles authorized actions, unauthorized state changes, and shadow-source ingestion—then read a hard execution verdict, not a probabilistic safety score.
Verdicts you will see: ADMITTED · FAIL_CLOSED · REVIEW_REQUIRED
Inject synthetic payload
Agent requests a summary of the firm's approved Q3 data retention policy.
"Our Q3 data retention policy mandates a T+91 day purge for all non-essential PII."
Payments & treasury
An agent attempts to approve a transfer outside authorized limits.
Insurance & claims
Automated coverage or claims actions must match bind-time policy artifacts.
Healthcare authorization
Clinical or admin workflows need proof the exact authorized transition ran.
Access & identity
Privilege grants and overrides are withheld when authority does not validate.
Underwriting & trading
High-consequence decisions get fail-closed verdicts before operational fact.
Procurement & copilots
Internal agents propose changes; the gate decides what may commit.
The Commit Boundary
A deterministic intercept between probabilistic reasoning and systems of record. Execution paths are fail-closed unless policy and identity checks pass at the gateway—not in a lagging dashboard.
Forensic Merkle ledger
Authorized commits seal into tamper-evident Merkle batches over entry_hash leaves. Exports recompute to a root in seconds with the open verification script—evidence you can rerun, not a narrative.
Sovereign knowledge base
Mandates and citations are versioned. The gate evaluates intent against your anchored policy surface—so drift and shadow sourcing surface as enforcement problems, not post-mortem surprises.
Deployment posture: In-site (VPC) · region-bound metadata · air-gapped verify (export + CLI)
The admissibility control plane
Post-generation alerts are probabilistic. BiDigest enforces a <50ms deterministic Commit Boundary. The verdict is computed against anchored controls and integrity constraints—not by asking a chat model whether the action "feels safe." If admissibility cannot be proven, the route fails closed.
When an unauthorized AI attempts a state-change (hallucinated advice, out-of-bounds API call), the Commit Boundary rejects the payload instantly.
Test your current AI stack against the Triple-Lock.
Synthetic boundary demo — swap in H.264 MP4s in public/videos/ when ready.
Why this matters now
The question is shifting from "Do we have an AI policy?" to "Can we afford the gap between what we approved earlier and what we are about to commit?" Three pressures often land on the same systems and budgets—so routing around execution architecture gets expensive.
Liability & operational risk
Agentic and automated workflows raise expectations for attribution and replay after a bad outcome—not a slide deck alone.
Regulatory & audit clocks
Frameworks increasingly expect demonstrable controls and traceable decisions for material systems—scope varies by tier and jurisdiction.
Cryptographic transition
PQC roadmaps and long-lived evidence raise the cost of informal audit trails and mutable narratives.
Structural risk: time-of-check to time-of-use—approving intent at t1 and executing against the world at t4 without re-binding at the commit boundary is how stale authority becomes committed reality.
From
To
Read the “why” lane (execution-centered governance) and the “how” lane (Execution Control Systems), then continue to the governance hub or simulator—same truth as the short domains that land on these paths.
New to the category? Start with plain-English timing and stack position—then doctrine, ECS, and the simulator.
For compliance, security architecture, and audit — primary sources for regulatory mapping stay with your counsel; we ship mechanical evidence and reader-friendly technical spine.
Reader
State of Admissibility 2026
Technical + regulatory-mapping spine (HTML).
Open whitepaper →Handbook
Trustee-tier handbook
Single canon: commit boundary, Triple-Lock, ledger.
Read handbook →Verify
Batch JSON verification
Recompute Merkle root from exported entry_hash leaves.
View CLI source →From intent to sealed evidence (illustrative path).
High-risk dual steps mirror the simulator; single approver_id remains Phase 1 production until dual-control migrations ship.
Agent proposes action
Deterministic gate
STATE_CHECK::
admissible(intent)
→ proceed | fail_closed
SoD + approvals
Sealed receipts
Evidence package
Three outcomes of deterministic governance
Intercept
Sub-50ms synchronous gate before payloads reach systems of record — deterministic boundary logic, not post-generation filtering and not delegated to a model vendor “safety” layer.
Evidence
Merkle-sealed receipts and forensic ledger rows — procurement-grade proof, not opinionated logs.
Sovereignty
Jurisdiction-aware policy and SKB routing so the same engine honors EU AI Act, NIST, and MAS-style accountability.
Before the gate runs
Usage-based verify pricing — no surprise platform tax. Governance pricing →
Triple-lock flow aligns legal, risk, and engineering on the same ground truth—before traffic hits your models.
Encoded means sign-off is bound to Anchor Prose and policy artifacts—not slide decks—and produces Merkle-ready telemetry your Forensic Ledger can cite under scrutiny.
Legal
Policy & regulatory fit
Risk
Control + evidence posture
Engineering
Enforcement in CI/CD
Request a scoped briefing on bind-time validation, forensic receipts, and what ships today versus roadmap.
Marketing and growth teams: per-LLM citation share lives on a separate track — AI visibility & citation share.