Absolute decision rights
The Triple-Lock gateway
Legal, Risk, and Engineering must reach consensus in under 50ms, or the transaction is blocked. No single stakeholder can silently authorize execution against your Anchor Prose.
Mechanical constraints
Deterministic governance is not a dashboard.
BiDigest ships enforcement primitives: intercept before execution, evidence under audit, and sovereignty over which policy layer applies. Below are the three mechanical constraints that produce the triple-lock outcome — not passive "AI visibility."
Three outcomes of deterministic governance
Intercept
Sub-50ms synchronous gate before payloads reach systems of record — not post-generation filtering.
Evidence
Merkle-sealed receipts and forensic ledger rows — procurement-grade proof, not opinionated logs.
Sovereignty
Jurisdiction-aware policy and SKB routing so the same engine honors EU AI Act, NIST, and MAS-style accountability.
The IFQ calculus at the boundary
Mechanical constraints are not opaque “AI safety.” The Identity Fidelity Quotient (IFQ) combines Anchor (A), Schema (S), Citation integrity (C), and Fidelity (F) at the commit boundary — so admissibility is a deterministic outcome, not a vibe check.
Patent pending — US Prov. App. No. 63/XXXXX
Three mechanical constraints
Procurement-grade evidence
Merkle-sealed forensic ledger
Every AI decision that passes the boundary generates a cryptographically immutable receipt. You do not merely log actions — you seal them for federal auditors and internal controls.
The splinternet solution
Jurisdiction-aware SKB
Your AI follows the EU AI Act in Frankfurt and NIST-aligned controls in Virginia using the same deterministic engine — policy routing and knowledge boundaries, not duplicate stacks.
See the final artifact
Sanitized sample of a Merkle attestation-style receipt (HTML). Production exports may attach to your forensic workflow and auditor packages.